Launch Welcome to our new website! We're still in the process of making updates and improvements, so please stay with us.

CSFFDM Logo
Close
CSFFDM Logo
  • About
    • Our demands
    • Governance
    • The Mechanism
  • UN FfD Process
    • About the process

      The United Nations, as the only global institution mandated to address economic and 
      social challenges where developing countries have an equal say, is the space to call for a systemic transformation of the global financial architecture. This is where the UN Financing for Development (FfD) process comes in – as a space to advance on the systemic changes we urgently need to see. 

      Read more

    • FFD Forum
      • General Information
      • 2025 ECOSOC Forum on Financing for Development
      • FFD Past Forums
    • FFD Conference
      • General Information
      • 4th FFD Conference 2025
      • Civil Society Forum 2025
      • Past Conferences
    • UN Tax Convention
      • Timeline of Events
      • Statements & Interventions
      • Side Events
      • The FfD Chronicle
  • Areas of Work
    • Debt
    • Systemic issues
    • Trade
    • Tax
    • Private Finance
    • Technology
    • International Development Cooperation
    • Climate Integrity
    • Feminist Agenda
  • News & Events
    • News
    • Events
    • Press Releases
  • Resources
    • All Resources
    • The FfD Chronicle
    • CS FfD Mechanism Statements and Inputs
    • Policy Briefs and Papers
    • Interventions
    • Member States Tracker
  • Search icon
  • HomeSeparator icon
  • News & Events
  • Separator icon
  • Side-Event Report: Systemic issues and debt in try...
Share
Twitter icon
Facebook icon
Mail icon
LinkedIn icon
Whatsapp icon
May 10, 2016

Side-Event Report: Systemic issues and debt in trying times: How can the FFD process help?

Side-Event at the ECOSOC Forum on Financing for Development follow-up organized by UNCTAD, the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung and the Addis Ababa CSO Coordinating Group – ACG and Women’s Working Group on FFD (with Brot für die Welt, Eurodad and Center of Concern acting as facilitating organizations)

Side-Event Summary prepared by:  Aldo Caliari, Director, Rethinking Bretton Woods Project, Center of Concern

Event Date and Time: United Nations, New York, 19 April 2016

Agenda:

Special welcome by H.E. Mr. Mukhisa Kituyi, Secretary General, UNCTAD (statement)

Moderator:
– Aldo Caliari, Director, Rethinking Bretton Woods Project, Center of Concern

Welcome:
– Bettina Luise Rürup, Executive Director, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung New York Office

Speakers:
– José Antonio Ocampo, Professor, School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University; Chair, Committee for Development Policy, United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) (presentation based on report)
– Manuel Montes, Senior Advisor, Finance and Development, South Centre (Presentation)
– Stephan Ohme, Head of Division on Financing for Development, Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation & Development, Germany
– Stephanie Blankenburg, Head, Debt and Development Finance Branch, Division on Globalization and Development Strategies, UNCTAD
– Bodo Ellmers, Policy and Advocacy Manager, Debt and Responsible Finance, Eurodad (Presentation)

Side-Event Summary:

Financing conditions for most developing countries were favorable for several years due to high export earnings and easy access to credit. This has changed rapidly in the past year, as commodity prices have collapsed and capital flows have dried up. Recessionary or subdued growth expectations are taking hold everywhere, not just in developing countries, reflecting deep uncertainties. The debt sustainability indicators of many countries have deteriorated fast, and outlooks are for further deterioration.

The Addis Ababa Action Agenda recommitted countries to addressing systemic issues, debt sustainability and the development financing agenda coming out of preceding conferences in Monterrey (2002) and Doha (2008), while promoting an emphasis on sustainable development. Against a challenging outlook for the global economy, the pursuit of a comprehensive reform agenda in this area is becoming increasingly urgent. The UN’s Financing for Development follow up process holds promise as a venue to build consensus and advance policy proposals to address these challenges.

The objective of the  side-event was to create a space to discuss systemic issues, including debt, which are key aspects of the holistic financing for development agenda are particularly urgent at these trying times, and how the FFD Process could help concretely move forward policy proposals to address them.

Some of the key messages and outcomes to emerge (including recommendations in bold) were:

Debt problem has been present for a long time, but treatment by IMF and World Bank tends to be in an atomized way. Now we know it is systemic, and affects even healthiest and soundest of borrowers. Responses have to also be systemic.

The 2016 Financing for Development Forum faces a tremendous challenge to forge coherence among three flagship development agreements from 2015: the Addis Ababa Action Agenda, Agenda 2030 and the Paris Climate Change Agreement. Systemic issues and debt are key among the areas where international cooperation is needed to move these interdependent processes forward.

Tax evasion and avoidance are massive problems: 100-240 billion US dollars are lost every year to tax evasion and avoidance, while 100 billion US dollars alone go missing from developing countries due to profit shifting by multinational corporations. The international community therefore needs strong forms of cooperation to control these problems. The UN has to be at the center of this process, so we should promote the work of the UN Committee of Experts on Inter­national Cooperation in Tax Matters while continuing to work towards creating a UN intergovernmental tax body on tax cooperation.

Reemerging systemic imbalances require designing a proper global financial safety net as a network of regional reserve funds and swap arrangements, and increasing the active use of the Special Drawing Rights. To address volatility of capital flows, the system should facilitate macroprudential regulations on cross-border flows. Broadening the participation of developing countries in international economic decision-making calls for a focus not only on Bretton Woods Institutions but also the FSB. We also need to put in place a multilateral system for that guarantees sovereign debt restructurings are timely, orderly, effective, fair and negotiated in good faith.

The IMF now ratified finding that international liquidity is episodic. This means developing countries are largely at the mercy of external payments booms and busts. The natural conclusion of this should be that debtor countries are not completely in control when their international liabilities increase and commodity prices are rising, which will lead to external debt problems when the trend reverses. There is a systemic basis for external payments booms and busts and requires, therefore, systemic solutions that cannot be found in the domestic policies of recipient countries alone.

Debt problem is interlinked with political and humanitarian challenges, too (Ebola crisis, confidence in financial markets. AAAA focused on diverse streams of resources to try to respond to what is a re-emerging debt crisis and commitments in all areas need to be pursued.

Regional In the face of exogenous nature of difficulties, and while global arrangements may take time, FFD can also support a middle-step of regional solutions, such as regional clearing units.

Financing for Development can be a venue for highlighting and building consensus on systemic interpretations of the crises and pursue proposals that are also systemic to solve the problems.

FFD follow up is a forum where debt sustainability can, and should, be addressed as a means to an end (as opposed to the way it is addressed by international financial institutions). It is a process not only to monitor implementation, but also develop further commitments that were generic and required further discussion. It should give follow up to the process started at the Ad hoc committee of the General Assembly on multilateral framework for sovereign debt restructuring.

FFD Forum outcome should not only indicate areas of progress, but also challenges and areas for further development, including some where the Forum itself takes responsibility, otherwise is 1) not credible and 2) not useful as a working document for UN Member States.

Related Updates

Explore all the updates
image
DebtTax
July 3, 2025

PRESS RELEASE: Civil Society Calls for Global Economic Justice at FfD4 Conference

Global South proposals, debt cancellation, and calls for economic justice take center stage in peaceful action inside UN conference venue.
image
June 25, 2025

The Civil Society FfD Mechanism Welcomes Over 1000 Participants to the FfD4 Civil Society Forum

The Civil Society Financing for Development (FfD) Mechanism is ready to welcome more than 1000 participants from across the globe to the FfD4 Civil Society Forum, taking place on June 28–29, 2025, in advance of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development (FfD4).
image
June 20, 2025

Side Events at the 4th International Conference on Financing for Development

Join us for a critical series of side events organized by the Civil Society FfD Mechanism during the 4th Financing for Development Conference.
Civil Society Financing For Development Mechanism
facebookxyoutubeinstagramlinkedin

Contact Us

addiscoordinatinggroup@gmail.com

facebookxyoutubeinstagramlinkedin
The CS FfD Mechanism is an open civil society platform including several hundreds of organizations and networks from diverse regions and constituencies around the world. CS FfD Mechanism’s core principle is ensuring that civil society can speak with one collective voice.
Built by Tectonica